Honorary award

for the best digital educational media.

Introduction to the quality criteria of educational media related to sustainability

The quality of educational media in adult education is not only measured by the medium or the media program itself, its content, its didactic-pedagogical format or its media technological finesse in order to ensure the lasting effects of teaching and learning, but also – when viewed in the context of media cultural education – in the configuration of the values ​​that are clearly determined in the interaction of teaching and learning: usefulness, aesthetics and ethics. None of these value categories stands alone. Media use is useful when it meets the criteria of aesthetics and ethics. The use of media in an educational context is aesthetic when normative and useful values ​​are introduced into a cultural educational format, and such formats are ethical when they benefit a cultural-aesthetic educational format.

 

So it’s about a complex connection of connectivity and contextuality: Media connects – not just people, but their knowledge, experience, attitude and history. They connect worlds the way we think we can or should think. And they are needed in the individually determined context of life, lifestyles, life prospects, life horizons and, ultimately, values.

 

Sustainability is a value intended in this way, which can only be identified as a critical pattern (criteria) of quality if and because it determines the usefulness of intellectual and practical education (knowledge, awareness, understanding, retention). . And: if and because, as a meaningful superstructure, it conveys an ethically conceivable and culturally aesthetically actionable (practical) connection between economy and ecology as a socially organized framework for a social development aimed at existence (harmony, balance) and coherence (justice, balance, dignity). becomes.

 

The criteria for awarding the N-Award are based on the description of the sustainability complex as already given, as it has already been tried and tested scientifically, politically and in specialist discourse, and as it is already well secured in the international-institutional exchange of concepts. In this environment, sustainability is thought of contextually as the interaction of the values ​​of ecology, economy and society. (Basics for assessing the contribution of digital educational media to sustainability).

The interpretive horizons of sustainability are contextual (growth, growth limits and growth opportunities of the economy and society) and transfigurative in the language model of media: a media-configured education refers to the characterization of communication, organization, culture and society as such, which are mutually used, necessary and possible are: Sustainability of natural resources as an opportunity and necessity for a socially sustainable society that understands each other in the model of sustainably oriented educational programs, increasingly realized in the context of their medialization and mediatization.

 

This requires the quality – first of all of content (sustainability-relevant and subject-defined knowledge, expertise, references, experience), but also requires the sustainable quality of media aestheticization (didactic use of media in role-playing teaching and learning (e.g. possibilities of internalization, motivation and sovereignty) and sustainability-effective pedagogical intention (social practice in the pattern of ethical understanding of learnable content: identification, responsibility), when educational content is sustainably characterized (media aestheticized) through its educational cultural transmission (mediatization) and its educational technologically possible mechanisms (mediatization).

 

The decisive factor in determining the award-worthiness of the educationally relevant quality of the educational media submitted for the award will therefore be whether and to what extent sustainability criteria are used in all or in certain categories (content, didactic-pedagogical orientation, media formats, retention and implementation values, creativity, media affinity) can be fulfilled. One perspective of evaluation will therefore (must be) sustainability as a universal educational value: The image of a sustainable world, created in thought (social-discursive, symbolic-cultural) and described in the media, is recognizable in a harmoniously coordinated relationship between knowledge, awareness and attitude towards it the natural, social, cultural, symbolic and inspirational values ​​of the world. Understanding their meaning then means making credible their use, their appearance (aesthetics) and their value (ethics) for shaping human existence (life) in the modalities of knowledge, consciousness and attitude. All of this is implied in the universal concept of sustainability in such a way that the term can be used like a metaphor to describe connections (represented in the media): sustainability as competence (knowledge and awareness as a basis for responsibility and attitude), values, conditions, events , events and attitudes to each other in order to do justice to the character of complexity, connectivity and contextuality included in the concept of sustainability.

These characteristics just mentioned are also connoted in the criteria for assessing the quality of the educational media submitted for the Sustainability Prize.

Sustainability model for digital educational media for sustainable development (BMNA)

The sustainability model outlined below is a basis for evaluating digital educational media for sustainable development (BMNA), which are characterized below.

Digital educational media for sustainable development (BMNA)
are carriers of information about objects and processes and means of communication between all those involved.

They are pedagogically or didactically structured, designed for use in teaching and learning processes, especially for sustainable development, and are available on various electronic and digital data carriers (Internet, USB, hybrid products, etc.).

 

Further principles for evaluating educational media are derived from the following goals and messages for sustainable development:

  1. Sustainability triangle:
  • Ecology – Goals of the ecological dimension of sustainability,
  • EconomicsGoals of the economic dimension of sustainability,
  • Social – Goals of the social dimension of sustainability.

Drei Säulen Modell

  1. FiveKey messages of the BMZ’s 2030 Agenda (“5 Ps”):
  • Protect the planet (Planet)
    Limit climate change, preserve natural resources
  • Promoting prosperity for all
    Making globalization fair
  • The focus is on human dignity (People)
    A world without poverty and hunger is possible
  • Promote peace (Peace)
    Human rights and good governance
  • Building global partnerships (Partnership)
  • Moving forward together globally

Die drei Bereiche und die fünf „P“s der Agenda 2030

  1. 17 sustainability goals (SDGs): 
  1. Take immediate action to combat climate change and its impacts.
  2. Preserve and use oceans, seas and marine resources sustainably for the purposes of sustainable development.
  3. Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, manage forests sustainably, combat desertification, halt and reverse soil degradation and halt biodiversity loss.
  4. Strengthen means of implementation and revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development.
  5. Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.
  6. Ensuring access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and contemporary energy for everyone.
  7. Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all.
  8. Build a resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and support innovation.
  9. Reduce inequality within and between states.
  10. Making cities and settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable.
  11. Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns.
  12. End poverty in all forms, everywhere.
  13. End hunger, achieve food security and better nutrition, and promote sustainable agriculture.
  14. Ensuring a healthy life for all people of all ages and promoting their well-being.
  15. Ensure inclusive, equitable and quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all.
  16. Achieve gender equality and self-determination for all women and girls.
  17. Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels.

SDG 17: Partnerschaften zur Erreichung der Ziele

 

Based on this, the following criteria areas were derived and for evaluation with quality criteria for educational media designed for sustainable development:

Criteria areas overview

Criteria area 1:

Quality criteria for sustainability:

Ecology, economy, social issues; (sustainability triangle)

Criteria area 2:

– Quality criteria

– Sustainable educational media

– Educational media for sustainability

 Other criteria areas:

– Quality criteria for education, skills, didactics

– Quality criteria for design, layout

– Quality criteria for technology, handling, application, innovation

are evaluated in the Comenius Award in the following media categories:

  1. DDM – Didactic digital media
  2. DMB – Digital media with educational potential
    3. SDB – Game-based digital educational media
    4. BLEP – Blended-Learnig-Programme
    5. LMS – Teaching and learning management systems.
  3. EBM – European social educational media
Criteria Area 1 table

Criteria area 1
Quality criteria for sustainability: ecology, economy, social issues; (sustainability triangle)
Quality criteria Testing aspects Point scoring

1. ENVIRONMENT


Protect the planet (Planet)
Limit climate change, preserve natural resources

At the level of the ecological dimension, the product promotes:

 

  • Reducing risks to people and the environment
  • The principles of environmental protection in an educational context and cultivates and corresponding thoughts in the public consciousness
  • The fight against climate change and global warming
  • Raises awareness of the importance of rational land use in protecting natural habitats and landscapes and minimizing urban pollution
  • The careful use of resources, the conservation of natural resources and waste management
  • Minimizing energy consumption
  • The reduction of emissions
  • The use of renewable forms of energy
  • Species protection and habitat protection.

 

(0-10)

2. ECONOMICS

Promote prosperity for all

(Prosperity)

Making globalization fair

At the level of the economic dimension, the product promotes:

  • The application of circular economy principles
  • The careful use of renewable raw materials
  • Reducing energy consumption to a minimum, using energy, water and raw materials sparingly, increasing operational efficiency, reducing waste, using environmentally friendly materials and producing environmentally friendly products
  • Long-term survival in the economy instead of short-term profit maximization
  • Growth and increased sales do not come at the expense of employees in the region and the environment
  • Technological changes in the production process to avoid and minimize waste, recover energy and recycle materials
  • New, environmentally friendly technologies that typically offer new, more cost-effective and socially responsible products that can increase sales.
  • Responsible handling of the environment, in particular an innovative set of processes, methods, projects and techniques to improve environmental performance and optimize a company’s environmental behavior.
  • The cooperative economy
  • The internationally fair distribution of the wealth produced.

 

(0-10)

3. SOCIAL

 

The focus is on human dignity (People)

A world without poverty and hunger is possible

 

Promote peace (Peace)

Human rights and good governance

 

Building global partnerships (Partnership)

Moving forward together globally

At the level of the social dimension, the product promotes:

 

  • freedom and peace
  • Justice, equal opportunities and solidarity (within and between generations) and financial security (pensions) for older and sick people
  • The satisfaction of basic needs (drinking, eating, sleeping, security)
  • The eradication of poverty
  • The right to education
  • Employment and the creation of jobs under fair conditions
  • The Access to basic infrastructure and health services with free medical care
  • The distribution of power and resources
  • Gender equality
  • Access to centers of influence and decision-making
  • Participation and democracy
  • Global partnerships, i.ehe international cooperation and solidarity
  • The preservation of local and global cultural heritage
  • Views and ways of thinking, such as holistic, systemic and multi-perspective thinking as well
    forward-looking, visionary and critical thinking
(0-10)
Points Sum of points (max. 30 points)
In total Criteria area 1
Total points divided by number of quality criteria / arithmetic mean, 1 decimal place (max. 10 points)

 

Criteria Area 2 table

 

Criteria area 2:

Quality criteria
Sustainable educational media
Educational media for sustainability:

 

Sustainability is a normative construct of economically, socially and politically relevant, but ecologically conceived values, which arise from the critical perception of the complex connections, the socially determined connections and the resulting contradictions between public and private, between individual and social, as well from political and ideological understanding (discourse) about the demands of lifestyle.

 

Media, especially those that are used in the public or private context of education, are assessed here in the context of assessing their quality not only in terms of their usefulness (sustainable technology), their clarity or pleasantness (sustainable aesthetics), but also in terms of their inherent value (sustainable ethics): how they are used or which patterns of individual and/or social use (mediality) are suggested or recommended in the context of education (knowledge, awareness, attitude).

 

Education, especially in the broad horizon of increasing medialization (cultural) and mediatization (structural) of the patterns of public and personal understanding about knowledge and what is worth knowing, is not only to be understood as a didactically arranged transfer of content from teachers to learners, but also gains the value of knowledge and awareness and competence in the context of communication between people who are socially and institutionally integrated in roles with assigned (personal and social) expectations of teaching and learning. But this happens in the social media environment, which increasingly intervenes in the institutional processes and the institutional understanding of education (social media, AI). On the one hand, this requires an open and discursive concept of education, acceptance of diversity, and on the other hand, a critical perception of the possibilities and suggestions for the sustainable use of resources and sources: literacy, resilience, competence are the relevant keywords here, which represent the (new, emancipatory (culturally and discursively conceived) distribution of skills, abilities, motivation and responsibility for a meaningful and lastingly relevant value for (social and personal) life.

 

For this reason, the following quality criteria should be considered for the testing and evaluation of educational media:

Quality criteria Testing aspects Point scoring
1. Complexity

The project justifies and explains:

  • Complex connections in terms of content, theoretically easy to understand because they are clearly justified,
  • Sustainability as a value of the complexity / contextuality / mediality of the topic is pointed out, drawn to attention, demanded,
  • Explanation of the complex connections between power and economy with regard to problems of the concentration of wealth and power or to values ​​of justice in the distribution of opportunities and goods.

 

(0-5)

2. Contextuality

The project justifies:

 

  • Sustainability is made recognizable as a universal value of the contextualization of spheres of life (depending on the topic), in the sense of the triangle model.
  • Draws attention to the factor of social inequality as an obstacle to social efforts towards sustainability.
  • References (media didactic paths) to the usefulness (reason) of aesthetics and ethics, to the ethics of usefulness and aesthetics of media contextualization, as well as to the aesthetic requirements of usefulness and ethics of media use in the context of education.

 

(0-5)

3.Mediality

The product promotes:

  • Creative-proactive, collaborative, interactive, media-aesthetically demanding use of media technology finesse,
  • Diverse media manifestations of the sustainability idea, the sustainability values, the sustainability claim combined with the topic or the matter/content,
  • Refers to offers/discourses or conversations in or from the social media environment.

 

(0-5)

4. Discursivity

The product offers:

  • as much scope as possible for debate, discussion of the content and its relevance, assignment,
  • Interpretations of sustainability, typical media formats, characteristics, paths for multi-perspectivity,
  • Open space for dialectics and contradictions in content.

 

(0-5)

5. Education

The product offers:

  • Suggestions, paths for collaborative, interactive, emotional learning,
  • Suggestions, ideas, paths for the highest possible degree of authenticity, self-reflection,
  • Identification for learners to get involved, draw their own conclusions and incorporate them into the program.

 

(0-5)

6. Media Quality

The product offers suggestions for:

  • the highest possible degree of productive media participation on the part of the learners,
  • for the introduction of the individual, media-determined life contexts,
  • Spheres of media performance by learners identified as broadly as possible,
  • Contextualization with media discourse experiences,

 

(0-5)

7. Empathy

The product motivates to:

  • Soft skills: the didactic media environment is structured in such a way that space is given for the introduction, expression and understanding of emotions, also with a view to sustainability (meaning).
  • On the other hand, the emotional connotation, especially in its media expression, is balanced so that emotional overload (emotionalization as an attention booster) does not disavow the aesthetics or usefulness of a statement

 

(0-5)

8. Sustainability Literacy 

The product increases interest in:

  • Knowledge-based arguments, tips,
  • reflection values ​​of sustainability,
  • Coherence, pragmatics of suggestions, advice, hints.

 

(0-5)

9. Responsibility

The project explains:

  • In addition to individual responsibility for sustainability values, social responsibility for sustainability values ​​is also addressed (as a problem and for solutions,
  • If there are knowledge positions in the product that justify the responsible character of the interdisciplinarity of science and/or the cooperation between institutions, organizations and companies,
  • There are references to the aspects of responsibility of political economy for/against state intervention or liberal economics

 

(0-5)

10. Company Policy

The product addresses:

  • Ethical values ​​in the interest of the durability, stability and peacefulness of society: social justice as a prerequisite for human dignity,
  • Critical attention to seemingly rational ideologemes (ideologies, assumptions, myths, conspiracy theories, populisms) that counteract human dignity and deepen inequalities,
  • Criticism of political-capitalist-motivated patterns of argumentation on environmental and climate protection.
Points Sum of points (max. 50 points)
In total Criteria area 2
Total points divided by number of quality criteria / arithmetic mean, 1 decimal place (max. 5 points)

 

Total points

Addition of points
Criteria areas 1 and 2

 

max. 15 points

 

Annotation:

Interpretation of the total score
14.0 – 15.0 points Exemplary
Media production
Very good
12.0 – 14.9 points Recommended
Media production
Good
9.0 -11.9 points Suitable
Media production
Satisfactory
5.0 – 8.9 points Usable
Media production
Sufficient
≤ 4.9 points Not recommended
Media production
Inadequate

 

Literature


Bauer, Thomas A. (2014): Communication scientific thinking. Perspectives of a contextual theory of social understanding. Vienna (Böhlau)

Bauer, Thomas A. (2017): Understanding knowledge in media society. Theoretical sketches on the mediology of social learning. IN: Bauer, Thomas A. (Mikuszeit, Bernd H. (ed.): Teaching and learning with educational media. Basics – Projects – Perspectives – Practice. Brussels – New York (P.Lang)

Bauer, Thomas A. (2023): Performative Mediality – Hermeneutical Notes Observing Challenges and Chances of Media Change. IN: Metaverse and future communications. Istanbul, Commerce University Publication No. 69, p. 6 – 18

Bourdieu, Pierre (1993): The field of cultural production. Stanford (University Press)

Habermas, Jürgen (1980): Theory of communicative action (2Bde). Frankfurt (Suhrkamp)

Luhmann, Niklas (1974): Social systems. Outline of a general theory. Frankfurt (Suhrkmp)

Mead, George Herbert (1972): Mind, Identity and Society. From the perspective of social behaviorism. Frankfurt (Suhrkamp)

Schmidt, Siegfried J. (2003): Stories and discourses. Farewell to constructivism. Frankfurt (Fischer TB)

Schütz, Alfred / Luckmann, Thomas (1973 ): The Structures of Life-World. London (University Press)

 

Dreieck der Nachhaltigkeit

Die drei Bereiche und die fünf „P“s der Agenda 2030

Drei Säulen Modell

The only European media award that is awarded independently of providers and producers.